IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Boyle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-03-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 7 10 0.400 0.0642 0.0642 — —
2012-13 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 7 13 0.520 0.0835 0.0835 — —
2013-14 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 13 14 27 1.080 0.1734 0.1734 — —
2014-15 Eden Prairie High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 15 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W SR 33 2 11 13 0.394
2017-18 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W JR 39 5 21 26 0.667
2016-17 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W SO 32 6 8 14 0.438
2015-16 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W FR 35 3 14 17 0.486
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.49
2015-16 · Ohio State
+225.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1741
Defenseman overall
#204
Defenseman born in 1997
#1310
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ebba Strandberg
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Maine (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kenzie Prater
Quinnipiac ·
0.432 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Allison Roethke
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.