Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-17 | Kenmore/Grand Island | USHS-W | 19 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.105 | 0.0089 | 0.0089 |
| 2017-18 | Kenmore/Grand Island | USHS-W | 20 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 0.750 | 0.0637 | 0.0637 |
| 2019-20 | Kenmore/Grand Island | USHS-W | 18 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 1.056 | 0.0896 | 0.0896 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | Neumann | UCHC | FR | 24 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 0.708 |
| 2023-24 | Chatham | UCHC | SR | 13 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.154 |
| 2022-23 | Chatham | UCHC | JR | 27 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2021-22 | Chatham | UCHC | SO | 27 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 0.407 |
| 2020-21 | Chatham | UCHC | FR | 13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0.231 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Macy Peterson | 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG | 0.194 | Post | CHA-W |
| Bella Webb | 2022-23 · 0.56 PPG | 0.316 | Bethel | MIAC |
| Kailin Kane | 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG | 0.625 | Johnson & Wales | NEHC |
| Hunter Reardon | 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG | 0.407 | Adrian | NCHA |
| Reese Swanson | 2023-24 · 0.67 PPG | 0.267 | St. Olaf | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.