← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Meyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 3 3 0.120 0.0181 0.0181
2019-20 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 5 4 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544
2020-21 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 1 5 6 0.316 0.0477 0.0477
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lake Forest D3 28 6 7 13 0.464
2023-24 Lake Forest D3 JR 28 6 7 13 0.464
2022-23 Lake Forest D3 SO 28 6 10 16 0.571
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 FR 25 2 5 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2021-22 · Lake Forest
+1537.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5497
Defenseman overall
#4786
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Union (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG
→ Vermont (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.01 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ RPI (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Brown
0.02 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Union ·
0.267 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Vermont ·
0.030 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Merrimack ·
0.529 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.