IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katelyn Courteau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 7 7 0.280 0.0423 0.0423 — —
2020-21 Dodge County High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 3 6 9 0.474 0.0715 0.0715 — —
2021-22 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 29 0 6 6 0.207 0.0312 0.0312 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Curry D3 — — 15 1 1 2 0.133
2023-24 Curry D3 — — 17 0 1 1 0.059
2022-23 Curry D3 — — 26 2 5 7 0.269
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2022-23 · Curry
+812.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5241
Defenseman overall
#509
Defenseman born in 2003
#4510
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Rachel Herzog
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Heather Olson
Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Xylia Lang
Lindenwood ·
0.091 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Herzog
St. Cloud State ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.