← Women's Rankings ↗ Social Card

Paige Michel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA

NCAA-W Projection

Projecting as:

Target Conference:

Show:

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W

0.28

Average (0.25–0.45)

Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2935

Conf. Strength0.994

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W / D2W

Projected PPG — Division Avg

0.27

Developing (<0.35)

Base D3e-W PPG0.2872

Conf. Strength1.000

Year Adj (FR)×0.80

Confidencehigh

Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-W PPG	Age-Adjusted
2011-12	Northfield Mt. Hermon	NE-Prep-Girls	14	0	6	6	0.430	0.1978	0.1978
2012-13	Northfield Mt. Hermon	NE-Prep-Girls	27	2	1	3	0.110	0.0506	0.0506
2013-14	Connecticut Polar Bears 19U	19U-AAA-W	30	0	6	6	0.200	0.0691	0.0691
2014-15	Northfield Mt. Hermon	NE-Prep-Girls	24	1	0	1	0.040	0.0184	0.0184

NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent · COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

Season	School	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2018-19	Connecticut College	NESCAC	—	23	3	5	8	0.348
2018-19	UConn	HEA-W	—	23	3	5	8	0.348
2016-17	Connecticut College	—	SO	12	0	2	2	0.167
2015-16	Connecticut College	—	FR	9	2	4	6	0.667

Historical Comparables (NCAA-W)

Player	League · Season · PPG	FR College PPG	School
Caroline Buckholtz	NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG	0.000	Brown
Natasha Rachlin	NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG	0.088	Harvard
Hannah Schultz	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG	0.267	Union
Anna Erickson	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.13 PPG	0.030	Vermont
Paige Sorensen	USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.09 PPG	0.529	Merrimack

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.