IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rachel Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 1 0 1 0.040 0.0060 0.0060 — —
2014-15 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2015-16 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 16 16 32 1.280 0.1933 0.1933 — —
2016-17 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 17 8 25 1.042 0.1573 0.1573 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA — 24 13 10 23 0.958
2020-21 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA — 16 11 13 24 1.500
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA JR 29 10 17 27 0.931
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA SO 29 13 31 44 1.517
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA FR 28 6 11 17 0.607
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.61
2017-18 · St. Scholastica
+312.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5481
Forward overall
#1124
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mikayla Kelley
Franklin Pierce · 2018-19
0.469 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bauer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jenna Curtis
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.