IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Stefishen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1990-08-15 Country: Canada
2008 · Round 5, Pick #136  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally
Univ. of Calgary · USports-M

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Langley Rivermen BCHL 59 25 31 56 0.949 0.3657 0.4152 1.3814 1.5685
2007-08 Langley Rivermen BCHL 57 33 48 81 1.421 0.5475 0.5922 2.0681 2.2368
2010-11 Prince George Cougars WHL 68 24 43 67 0.985 0.4793 0.4379 2.4176 2.2090
2011-12 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 25 12 11 23 0.920 0.4854 0.5224 2.6965 2.9020
2012-13 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 28 5 17 22 0.786 0.4145 0.4270 2.3029 2.3722
2013-14 Univ. of Calgary USports-M 26 7 25 32 1.231 0.6494 0.6382 3.6075 3.5453
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 27 5 8 13 0.481
2008-09 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 15 3 5 8 0.533
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.49
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2008-09 · Ohio State
+9.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#4636
Forward overall
#217
Forward born in 1990

D2/3 Comparables

Neil Trimm
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Arkhip Ledenkov
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Osmundson
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.