IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greta Nundahl Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 1 8 9 0.360 0.0544 0.0544 — —
2011-12 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 4 4 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2012-13 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 1 9 10 0.400 0.0604 0.0604 — —
2013-14 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 2 22 24 0.960 0.1450 0.1450 — —
2014-15 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 8 17 25 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
2015-16 Irondale High USHS-MN-W 25 5 11 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA SR 29 9 9 18 0.621
2018-19 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA JR 29 8 11 19 0.655
2017-18 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA SO 28 4 8 12 0.429
2016-17 St. Scholastica D3 NCHA FR 27 1 13 14 0.519
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2016-17 · St. Scholastica
+364.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1922
Defenseman overall
#1459
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morgan Zirbel
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2014-15
0.393 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauryn Folker
Saint Mary's · 2014-15
0.160 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Claire Casey
Franklin Pierce · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.