IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Woodman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Rock County Fury USHS-W 23 9 12 21 0.913 0.2745 0.2745 — —
2012-13 Rock County Fury USHS-W 23 11 20 31 1.348 0.4053 0.4053 — —
2013-14 Rock County Fury USHS-W 24 21 22 43 1.792 0.5388 0.5388 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA — 27 2 11 13 0.481
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 27 2 11 13 0.481
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 26 3 8 11 0.423
2016-17 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 25 3 9 12 0.480
2015-16 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.46
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2015-16 · Concordia (WI)
-21.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#136
Defenseman overall
#345
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kendra Nealey
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Heidi Niskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.19 PPG
→ RPI
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Katelyn Brightbill
Franklin Pierce · 2017-18
0.844 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Anderson
St. Scholastica · 2015-16
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Sergent
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.