IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Carolyn Chrastka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Maine Township High USHS-W 9 5 2 7 0.778 0.2339 0.2339 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC — 17 1 0 1 0.059
2021-22 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 18 1 0 1 0.056
2020-21 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SR 10 0 1 1 0.100
2020-21 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 10 0 1 1 0.100
2019-20 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC JR 25 5 3 8 0.320
2019-20 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 25 5 3 8 0.320
2018-19 Saint Mary's D3 MIAC SO 24 5 7 12 0.500
2018-19 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC — 24 5 7 12 0.500
2017-18 Saint Mary's (MN) D3 MIAC FR 25 0 2 2 0.080
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2017-18 · Saint Mary's (MN)
-60.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Demi Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.55 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Wente
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sara Hjalmarsson
Providence ·
0.657 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Demi Gardner
Minnesota State ·
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.