IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Henthorne Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 23 6 6 12 0.522 0.0788 0.0788 — —
2013-14 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 25 7 4 11 0.440 0.0664 0.0664 — —
2014-15 Roseville High USHS-MN-W 20 11 9 20 1.000 0.1510 0.1510 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Hamline D3 MIAC — 25 5 2 7 0.280
2018-19 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 18 2 4 6 0.333
2017-18 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2016-17 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 16 3 2 5 0.312
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2016-17 · Adrian
+211.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7259
Forward overall
#260
Forward born in 1998
#1837
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erica Schramel
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bailey Olson
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2017-18
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dynnea Bezona
Endicott · 2012-13
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.