IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johanna Glaaser Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 New Trier High White USHS-W 14 2 0 2 0.143 0.0430 0.0430 — —
2013-14 New Trier High USHS-W 13 1 2 3 0.231 0.0694 0.0694 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Olaf D3 — — 25 6 3 9 0.360
2018-19 St. Olaf D3 — — 25 1 5 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2018-19 · St. Olaf
+376.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11421
Forward overall
#3794
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Mallorie Iozzo
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Presley Norby
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mallorie Iozzo
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sierra Smith
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Heise
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.