IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kirsten Olson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0483 0.0483 — —
2013-14 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 8 5 13 0.520 0.0785 0.0785 — —
2014-15 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 16 24 40 1.600 0.2416 0.2416 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 24 2 2 4 0.167
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC — 25 1 4 5 0.200
2011-12 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC — 24 2 3 5 0.208
2002-03 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2001-02 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 28 4 10 14 0.500
2000-01 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 17 10 9 19 1.118

NCAAe Rankings

#5399
Forward overall
#1089
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG
→ Penn State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.24 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kiki Radke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Madsen
Penn State ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.