IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kristen Cash Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 2 7 9 0.346 0.0523 0.0523 — —
2014-15 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 5 11 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
2015-16 Mounds View High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 3 14 17 0.680 0.1027 0.1027 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SR 27 4 12 16 0.593
2018-19 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC JR 14 0 3 3 0.214
2017-18 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC SO 28 5 14 19 0.679
2016-17 Gustavus Adolphus D3 MIAC FR 27 3 7 10 0.370
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2016-17 · Gustavus Adolphus
+291.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3025
Defenseman overall
#2382
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Briana Jorde
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.68 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Emma Turbyville
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.39 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Arianna Kosakowski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Union
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Karen Hudson
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2014-15
0.348 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jane Hannula
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lexi Klein
Endicott · 2013-14
0.905 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.