IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kaytlin Johnson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Black River Falls High USHS-W 24 11 8 19 0.792 0.2381 0.2381 — —
2015-16 Black River Falls High USHS-W 20 20 9 29 1.450 0.4360 0.4360 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Concordia (WI) D3 — — 27 1 10 11 0.407
2021-22 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SR 27 1 11 12 0.444
2020-21 Concordia (WI) D3 — — 19 2 11 13 0.684
2020-21 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 19 2 11 13 0.684
2019-20 Concordia (WI) D3 — — 24 1 1 2 0.083
2019-20 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 24 1 1 2 0.083
2018-19 Concordia (WI) D3 — — 27 0 3 3 0.111
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 27 0 3 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2018-19 · Concordia (WI)
-67.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#229
Defenseman overall
#534
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Lauren Kelly
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.53 No data
NCAAe PPG
Anna Kilponen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Kelly
Dartmouth ·
0.208 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Marchin
Yale ·
0.207 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Wright
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.