IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Kelly Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1992-01-31 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Vanke Rays · CWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2012-13 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 26 12 7 19 0.730 0.3359 0.3359 — —
2013-14 Winchendon NE-Prep-Girls 29 17 13 30 1.030 0.4739 0.4739 — —
2017-18 Vanke Rays CWHL 23 1 1 2 0.087 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SR 33 12 9 21 0.636
2016-17 Northeastern D1 HEA-W JR 37 2 8 10 0.270
2015-16 Northeastern D1 HEA-W SO 36 4 16 20 0.556
2014-15 Northeastern D1 HEA-W FR 34 7 6 13 0.382
2013-14 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SR 26 2 1 3 0.115
2013-14 Northeastern D1 HEA-W — 34 19 13 32 0.941
2012-13 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W JR 22 0 3 3 0.136
2012-13 Northeastern D1 HEA-W — 36 16 12 28 0.778
2011-12 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W SO 29 0 4 4 0.138
2010-11 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W FR 24 0 5 5 0.208

NCAAe Rankings

#141
Defenseman overall
#39
Defenseman born in 1992

D1 Comparables

Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kendra Nealey
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Mastel
Harvard ·
0.258 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Wright
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Marchin
Yale ·
0.207 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.