← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Marchin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-26 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Metropolitan Riveters · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Choate NE-Prep-Girls 22 7 10 17 0.770 0.3543 0.3543
2018-19 Connecticut Whale PHF 13 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Connecticut Whale PHF 24 0 3 3 0.125
2020-21 Connecticut Whale PHF 4 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Connecticut Whale PHF 14 1 1 2 0.143
2022-23 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048
2023-24 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048
2024-25 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048
2025-26 Metropolitan Riveters PHF 21 0 1 1 0.048
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Yale D1 ECAC-W 31 7 12 19 0.613
2015-16 Yale D1 ECAC-W 29 1 5 6 0.207
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.33
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2015-16 · Yale
-38.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#214
Defenseman overall
#53
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG
→ RIT (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dartmouth ·
0.208 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
North Dakota ·
0.257 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.