| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006-07 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 50 | 6 | 13 | 19 | 0.380 | 0.2242 | 0.2199 | 1.1196 | 1.0982 |
| 2007-08 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 59 | 22 | 23 | 45 | 0.763 | 0.4499 | 0.4183 | 2.2471 | 2.0891 |
| 2015-16 | Spartak Moskva | KHL | 40 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 0.400 | 1.0000 | 0.9449 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Frölunda HC | SHL | 45 | 14 | 19 | 33 | 0.733 | 1.8332 | 1.5234 | — | — |
| 2017-18 | HK Sochi | KHL | 47 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 0.660 | 1.6490 | 1.4187 | — | — |
| 2020-21 | Shanghai Dragons | KHL | 31 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0.419 | 1.0485 | 1.0485 | — | — |
| 2021-22 | Kärpät | Liiga | 35 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0.371 | 0.9285 | 0.5241 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | UMass | D1 | — | SO | 36 | 23 | 22 | 45 | 1.250 |
| 2008-09 | UMass | D1 | — | FR | 39 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 0.846 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.