IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Waller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-05-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 — OJHL 43 0 6 6 0.140 0.0390 0.0423 0.0963 0.1046
2003-04 — OJHL 39 0 7 7 0.179 0.0502 0.0522 0.1239 0.1289
2005-06 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 48 6 11 17 0.354 0.0597 0.0585 0.1472 0.1441
2006-07 Aurora Tigers OJHL 45 4 47 51 1.133 0.3166 0.2860 0.7821 0.7065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 0 20 20 0.667
2009-10 Adrian D3 — JR 28 4 19 23 0.821
2008-09 Adrian D3 — SO 29 4 30 34 1.172
2007-08 Adrian D3 — FR 29 7 39 46 1.586
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.59
2007-08 · Adrian
+761.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5457
Defenseman overall
#916
Defenseman born in 1986
#1930
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Casey Nelson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anthony Iacullo
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bosio
SUNY Geneseo · 2016-17
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.