← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quinn Waller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1986-05-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2002-03 OJHL 43 0 6 6 0.140 0.0342 0.0371 0.0960 0.1042
2003-04 OJHL 39 0 7 7 0.179 0.0440 0.0458 0.1236 0.1286
2005-06 North Bay Skyhawks NOJHL 48 6 11 17 0.354 0.0592 0.0580 0.1475 0.1444
2006-07 Aurora Tigers OJHL 45 4 47 51 1.133 0.2778 0.2510 0.7803 0.7049
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2010-11 Adrian D3 NCHA SR 30 0 20 20 0.667
2009-10 Adrian D3 NCHA JR 28 4 19 23 0.821
2008-09 Adrian D3 NCHA SO 29 4 30 34 1.172
2007-08 Adrian D3 NCHA FR 29 7 39 46 1.586
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.59
2007-08 · Adrian
+866.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7249
Defenseman overall
#970
Defenseman born in 1986
#1504
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Williams · 2024-25
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Saint Anselm · 2017-18
0.655 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.