IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mack Rosin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — USHS-W 24 1 5 6 0.250 0.0752 0.0752 — —
2019-20 Cap City Cougars USHS-W 19 3 14 17 0.895 0.2690 0.2690 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Marian D3 NCHA — 25 2 3 5 0.200
2022-23 Marian D3 NCHA — 21 1 1 2 0.095
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA — 23 1 3 4 0.174
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA — 12 1 5 6 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Marian
+604.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1112
Defenseman overall
#1535
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Boyle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.49 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Brittney Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.57 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jessica Adolfsson
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kelsey Crow
Penn State ·
0.160 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Boyle
Ohio State ·
0.486 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.