IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Henriksen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 8 14 0.560 0.0846 0.0846 — —
2017-18 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 25 11 1 12 0.480 0.0725 0.0725 — —
2018-19 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 25 8 7 15 0.600 0.0906 0.0906 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 St. Catherine D3 — SR 25 2 3 5 0.200
2022-23 St. Catherine D3 — JR 24 7 6 13 0.542
2021-22 St. Catherine D3 — SO 25 3 8 11 0.440
2020-21 St. Catherine D3 — FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8820
Forward overall
#380
Forward born in 2002
#2570
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mallorie Iozzo
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sierra Smith
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Heise
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Madison Oelkers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Laura Anderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mallorie Iozzo
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sierra Smith
Minnesota ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Heise
Minnesota ·
0.897 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.