← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Kali Rutka Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.12
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1269
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.29
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.3023
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2014-15 Boston Shamrocks JWHL-U19 28 0 11 11 0.393 0.1525 0.1525
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2017-18 Morrisville SUNYAC JR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Morrisville SUNYAC SO 27 1 2 3 0.111
2015-16 Morrisville SUNYAC FR 24 5 10 15 0.625

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Mekenzie Steffen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.350 Wisconsin
Izzy Bagi 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG 0.556 Holy Cross
Lauren Boyle USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.08 PPG 0.486 Ohio State
Kate Hallett USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.100 Harvard
Katie Robinson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 0.129 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Tala Gallaga 2010-11 · 1.00 PPG — St. Olaf MIAC
Julia Osowski 2011-12 · 1.48 PPG 0.269 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC
Addison Alaoui 2024-25 · 0.48 PPG 0.833 Lebanon Valley MAC
Callie Fagerstrom 2015-16 · 0.83 PPG 0.480 Concordia MIAC
Malia Mckinnon 2022-23 · 1.19 PPG 0.346 Bethel MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.