IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Skyler Sharfman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-01-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 31 3 4 7 0.226 0.0780 0.0762 — —
2022-23 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 31 0 6 6 0.194 0.0669 0.0620 — —
2023-24 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 72 3 11 14 0.194 0.0672 0.0579 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA — 34 1 6 7 0.206
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA FR 34 1 6 7 0.206
2024-25 Boston College D1 HEA-W — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3199
Defenseman overall
#412
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Lauren Niska
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth
0.06 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kate Glover
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ Harvard (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Abby Ecker
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Bemidji State
0.07 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ellie Larson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ RIT (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Niska
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Glover
Harvard ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Michel
UConn ·
0.348 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.