IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lilah Bauer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 NAHA Red 16U 16U-AAA-W 63 4 12 16 0.254 0.1139 0.1135 — —
2022-23 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 59 1 3 4 0.068 0.0231 0.0239 — —
2023-24 NAHA White 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 78 6 11 17 0.218 0.0742 0.0720 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SO 32 0 7 7 0.219
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D3 — SO 32 0 7 7 0.219
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 32 2 9 11 0.344
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D3 — FR 28 2 8 10 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.34
2024-25 · Franklin Pierce
+590.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3505
Defenseman overall
#441
Defenseman born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Penn State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.06 PPG
→ Penn State (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tristen Truax
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Paige Michel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ UConn (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Jackson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.07 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelsey Crow
Penn State ·
0.160 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessica Adolfsson
Penn State ·
0.343 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Tristen Truax
Minnesota State ·
0.167 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.