← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Jamison Hirsh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-08-01 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.05
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.0577
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.13
Developing (<0.35)
Base D3e-W PPG0.1545
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

0%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
95%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 16U-AAA-W 36 3 1 4 0.111 0.0397 0.0397
2023-24 16U-AAA-W 40 2 3 5 0.125 0.0447 0.0447
2024-25 19U-AAA-W 68 9 2 11 0.162 0.0664 0.0664
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Syracuse CHA-W FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Rose Rather NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG 0.824 Holy Cross
Sierra Smith USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG 0.000 Minnesota
Mallorie Iozzo USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG 0.069 Minnesota Duluth
Taylor Heise USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG 0.897 Minnesota
Laura Anderson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG 0.290 Yale

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Macy Peterson 2022-23 · 0.93 PPG 0.194 Post CHA-W
Bella Webb 2022-23 · 0.56 PPG 0.316 Bethel MIAC
Hunter Reardon 2022-23 · 0.42 PPG 0.407 Adrian NCHA
Kailin Kane 2023-24 · 0.28 PPG 0.625 Johnson & Wales NEHC
Reese Swanson 2023-24 · 0.67 PPG 0.267 St. Olaf MIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.