← New Search ↗ Social Card

Adam Tambellini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-11-01 Country: Canada
2013 · Round 3, Pick #65  ·  New York Rangers New York Rangers
Signed Professionally
Rögle BK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Sherwood Park Crusaders AJHL 3 1 0 1 0.333 0.1118 0.1285 0.3084 0.3544
2011-12 Vernon Vipers BCHL 55 27 29 56 1.018 0.3923 0.4291 1.4818 1.6209
2012-13 BCHL 52 36 29 65 1.250 0.4816 0.5040 1.8191 1.9039
2013-14 Calgary Hitmen WHL 31 17 22 39 1.258 0.6121 0.5958 3.0870 3.0047
2014-15 Calgary Hitmen WHL 71 47 39 86 1.211 0.5893 0.5448 2.9722 2.7479
2019-20 MoDo Hockey Allsvenskan 37 28 35 63 1.703 4.2568 4.2568 15.9746 15.9746
2020-21 Rögle BK SHL 37 15 13 28 0.757 1.8920 1.8920 9.8752 9.8752
2021-22 Rögle BK SHL 39 24 19 43 1.103 2.7565 2.6950 14.3874 14.0666
2022-23 Rögle BK SHL 49 23 23 46 0.939 2.3470 2.2393 12.2500 11.6879
2023-24 Rögle BK SHL 51 11 19 30 0.588 1.4705 1.3082 7.6752 6.8279
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 North Dakota D1 NCHC FR 16 2 2 4 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.41
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2013-14 · North Dakota
-38.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

🏒 NHL / Pro Track — production profile is consistent with players who bypassed or minimized college hockey
0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
NHL / Pro

NCAAe Rankings

#88
Forward overall
#6
Forward born in 1994

D2/3 Comparables

Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2018-19
1.448 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.