IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jada Ward Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Sun Prairie High USHS-W 23 21 16 37 1.609 0.4837 0.4837 — —
2014-15 Sun Prairie High USHS-W 22 17 6 23 1.046 0.3144 0.3144 — —
2015-16 Sun Prairie High USHS-W 23 23 11 34 1.478 0.4445 0.4445 — —
2016-17 — USHS-W 23 12 19 31 1.348 0.4053 0.4053 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wisconsin-Eau Claire D3 WIAC FR 5 1 0 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.36
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Wisconsin-Eau Claire
-44.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1270
Forward overall
#422
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Molly Shelton
Wisconsin-Superior · 2014-15
0.519 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Payton Rudiger
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
0.435 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Labbe
Norwich · 2014-15
0.692 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.