IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maggie Connors Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-22 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Sceptres · PWHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 52 17 19 36 0.692 0.2015 0.2211 — —
2015-16 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 59 35 34 69 1.169 0.3404 0.3550 — —
2016-17 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 54 38 42 80 1.482 0.4313 0.4291 — —
2024-25 Toronto Sceptres PWHL 30 2 0 2 0.067 — — — —
2025-26 Toronto Sceptres PWHL 30 3 2 5 0.167 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Princeton D1 ECAC-W — 31 17 16 33 1.065
2021-22 Princeton D1 ECAC-W — 31 13 9 22 0.710
2019-20 Princeton D1 ECAC-W — 33 22 25 47 1.424
2018-19 Princeton D1 ECAC-W — 32 26 17 43 1.344
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.34
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.34
2018-19 · Princeton
+293.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1515
Forward overall
#74
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Rooney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dana Rasmussen
Ohio State ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.