← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryn Saarela Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Williston Northampton School USHS-W 24 15 6 21 0.875 0.2631 0.2501
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Syracuse D1 CHA-W 38 17 12 29 0.763
2023-24 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SR 33 3 11 14 0.424
2022-23 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA JR 34 6 8 14 0.412
2021-22 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SO 33 6 6 12 0.364
2020-21 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA FR 20 6 6 12 0.600
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.60
2020-21 · College of the Holy Cross
+180.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
80%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1924
Forward overall
#81
Forward born in 2001
#667
in USHS-W

D1 Comparables

19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Post · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.