IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sawyer Fleming Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Rochester Lourdes High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 14 23 0.920 0.1478 0.1478 — —
2020-21 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 31 9 9 18 0.581 0.1690 0.1690 — —
2021-22 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 48 12 26 38 0.792 0.2305 0.2473 — —
2022-23 Shattuck St. Mary's 16U USHS-W 60 32 40 72 1.200 0.3493 0.3530 — —
2023-24 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 52 6 9 15 0.288 0.0840 0.0798 — —
2024-25 Shattuck St. Mary's Prep USHS-W 46 13 22 35 0.761 0.2215 0.2037 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Princeton D1 ECAC-W — 32 3 0 3 0.094
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2025-26 · Princeton
-28.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3755
Forward overall
#144
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sena Hanson
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.