IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Natalie Heising Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 3 8 11 0.458 0.0736 0.0736 — —
2014-15 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 9 20 29 1.208 0.1941 0.1941 — —
2015-16 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 17 19 36 1.636 0.2628 0.2628 — —
2016-17 Wayzata High (W) USHS-MN-W 19 11 9 20 1.053 0.1690 0.1690 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 33 20 20 40 1.212
2020-21 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 17 7 13 20 1.177
2019-20 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 34 13 8 21 0.618
2018-19 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 36 15 13 28 0.778
2017-18 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 36 19 9 28 0.778
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.78
2017-18 · Penn State
+339.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3809
Forward overall
#158
Forward born in 1999
#568
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.