IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Larson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.0482 0.0482 — —
2013-14 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 24 11 7 18 0.750 0.1205 0.1205 — —
2014-15 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 13 12 25 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
2015-16 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 25 19 12 31 1.240 0.1991 0.1991 — —
2016-17 Hutchinson High USHS-MN-W 24 14 18 32 1.333 0.2141 0.2141 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 RIT D1 CHA-W — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2019-20 RIT D1 CHA-W — 31 4 7 11 0.355
2018-19 RIT D1 CHA-W — 35 6 10 16 0.457
2017-18 RIT D1 CHA-W FR 35 0 5 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · RIT
-27.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#937
Defenseman overall
#161
Defenseman born in 1999
#645
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.