IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Bowlby Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-09-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 0 6 6 0.240 0.0385 0.0385 — —
2013-14 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 4 13 17 0.680 0.1092 0.1092 — —
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN-W 22 5 14 19 0.864 0.1387 0.1387 — —
2015-16 Edina High USHS-MN-W 22 2 13 15 0.682 0.1095 0.1095 — —
2016-17 Edina High USHS-MN-W 25 8 16 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Wisconsin D1 — SR 38 1 24 25 0.658
2020-21 Wisconsin D1 — JR 21 0 18 18 0.857
2019-20 Wisconsin D1 — SO 36 3 17 20 0.556
2018-19 Wisconsin D1 — FR 41 0 12 12 0.293
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 WCHA-W FR 38 0 12 12 0.316
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2017-18 · Wisconsin
+145.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1846
Defenseman overall
#221
Defenseman born in 1998
#1393
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
Wisconsin ·
0.350 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.