IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kenzie Prater Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 9 12 21 0.840 0.1349 0.1349 — —
2012-13 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 24 5 15 20 0.833 0.1338 0.1338 — —
2013-14 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 19 10 8 18 0.947 0.1522 0.1522 — —
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 21 7 10 17 0.809 0.1300 0.1300 — —
2015-16 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN-W 25 10 18 28 1.120 0.1799 0.1799 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SR 37 5 11 16 0.432
2018-19 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W JR 36 3 5 8 0.222
2017-18 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W SO 29 4 3 7 0.241
2016-17 Quinnipiac D1 ECAC-W FR 37 6 10 16 0.432
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · Quinnipiac
+186.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1446
Defenseman overall
#186
Defenseman born in 1997
#1063
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Allison Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.