IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

McKenzie Sederberg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-03-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Andover High USHS-MN-W 24 0 4 4 0.167 0.0268 0.0268 — —
2013-14 Andover High USHS-MN-W 24 3 11 14 0.583 0.0937 0.0937 — —
2014-15 Andover High USHS-MN-W 25 10 12 22 0.880 0.1413 0.1413 — —
2015-16 Andover High USHS-MN-W 10 4 2 6 0.600 0.0964 0.0964 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 37 4 9 13 0.351
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 34 2 3 5 0.147
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 33 1 6 7 0.212
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W SO 33 1 6 7 0.212
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 16 0 2 2 0.125
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 16 0 2 2 0.125
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2016-17 · Minnesota
+15.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2504
Defenseman overall
#259
Defenseman born in 1998
#1959
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amanda Kimmerle
RPI ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Megan Hinze
Minnesota ·
0.182 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Olson
Merrimack ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.