IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kate Glover Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-07-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 7 8 0.348 0.0559 0.0559 — —
2013-14 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 1 5 6 0.273 0.0438 0.0438 — —
2014-15 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 2 9 11 0.500 0.0803 0.0803 — —
2015-16 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 9 15 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542 — —
2016-17 Hopkins/St. Louis Park High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 6 23 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Harvard D1 ECAC-W SR 31 2 3 5 0.161
2020-21 Harvard D1 ECAC-W JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Harvard D1 ECAC-W SO 33 1 4 5 0.151
2018-19 Harvard D1 ECAC-W FR 32 0 5 5 0.156
2017-18 Harvard D1 ECAC-W FR 30 0 5 5 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2017-18 · Harvard
2.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1544
Defenseman overall
#202
Defenseman born in 1998
#1143
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Kate Hallett
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Robinson
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.