← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Jackson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Tartan Senior High USHS-MN-W 25 2 3 5 0.200 0.0321 0.0321
2011-12 Tartan Senior High USHS-MN-W 22 9 2 11 0.500 0.0803 0.0803
2012-13 Tartan Senior High USHS-MN-W 25 5 6 11 0.440 0.0707 0.0707
2013-14 Tartan Senior High USHS-MN-W 24 10 9 19 0.792 0.1271 0.1271
2014-15 Tartan Senior High USHS-MN-W 25 10 6 16 0.640 0.1028 0.1028
2015-16 North St. Paul/Tartan (W) USHS-MN-W 25 14 15 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 31 0 2 2 0.065
2018-19 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 35 0 2 2 0.057
2017-18 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 33 3 4 7 0.212
2017-18 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W SO 33 3 4 7 0.212
2016-17 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W 23 1 2 3 0.130
2016-17 Minnesota State D1 WCHA-W FR 23 1 2 3 0.130
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.13
2016-17 · Minnesota
-9.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#1638
Defenseman overall
#209
Defenseman born in 1998
#1230
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Harvard ·
0.100 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.129 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.