IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grace Wolfe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 3 6 9 0.360 0.0578 0.0578 — —
2017-18 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 3 11 14 0.609 0.0978 0.0978 — —
2018-19 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 7 18 25 1.042 0.1673 0.1673 — —
2020-21 Owatonna High (W) USHS-MN-W 20 5 22 27 1.350 0.2168 0.2168 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W GR 37 6 15 21 0.568
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 36 2 7 9 0.250
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 11 3 4 7 0.636
2022-23 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SO 37 2 16 18 0.486
2021-22 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W FR 32 0 3 3 0.094
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2021-22 · St. Cloud State
+21.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1547
Defenseman overall
#222
Defenseman born in 2003
#1148
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Amanda Kimmerle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ RPI (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Megan Hinze
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cheyenne Harris
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Union (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Turnquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amanda Kimmerle
RPI ·
0.059 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Megan Hinze
Minnesota ·
0.182 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Olson
Merrimack ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.