IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katelyn Roberts Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 10 9 19 0.760 0.1221 0.1221 — —
2018-19 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 20 9 29 1.160 0.1863 0.1863 — —
2019-20 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 24 18 22 40 1.667 0.2677 0.2677 — —
2020-21 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 16 2 12 14 0.875 0.1405 0.1405 — —
2021-22 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 22 21 17 38 1.727 0.2774 0.2774 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SR 39 16 17 33 0.846
2024-25 Penn State D1 WCHA-W JR 38 11 24 35 0.921
2023-24 Penn State D1 WCHA-W SO 38 13 15 28 0.737
2022-23 Penn State D1 WCHA-W FR 37 3 4 7 0.189
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · Penn State
-8.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3195
Forward overall
#130
Forward born in 2004
#415
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Charly Dalhquist
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.68 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mariah Gardner
Minnesota ·
0.071 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Gunderson
Lindenwood ·
0.171 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.