IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gracie Gilkyson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-03-04 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 7 3 10 0.357 0.0818 0.0818 — —
2019-20 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 24 7 15 22 0.917 0.2100 0.2100 — —
2020-21 Calgary Edge School U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 3 2 3 5 1.667 0.3818 0.3818 — —
2021-22 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 34 17 36 53 1.559 0.5593 0.5593 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Yale D1 ECAC-W SR 36 9 18 27 0.750
2024-25 Yale D1 ECAC-W JR 31 4 7 11 0.355
2023-24 Yale D1 ECAC-W SO 32 6 9 15 0.469
2022-23 Yale D1 ECAC-W FR 24 0 5 5 0.208
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.35
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Yale
-40.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 18 comparables)

11%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
89%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#236
Defenseman overall
#58
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Kendra Nealey
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Meghan Turner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.56 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Heidi Niskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.19 PPG
→ RPI
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kendra Nealey
Cornell ·
0.212 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Briana Mastel
Harvard ·
0.258 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Meghan Turner
Quinnipiac ·
0.351 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.