← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Laney Potter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-12-05 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.67
Strong (0.45–0.70)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.6537
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.87
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.43
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.5116
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

30%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
68%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 — 19U-AAA-W 41 12 21 33 0.805 0.3304 0.3304
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2026-27 Wisconsin WCHA-W SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2025-26 Wisconsin WCHA-W JR 38 10 16 26 0.684
2024-25 Wisconsin WCHA-W SO 37 3 23 26 0.703
2023-24 Wisconsin WCHA-W FR 41 4 12 16 0.390

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Briana Mastel NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG 0.258 Harvard
Anna Kilponen SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG 0.257 North Dakota
Anna Wright NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG 0.000 Maine
Taylor Marchin NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG 0.207 Yale
Lauren Kelly NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG 0.208 Dartmouth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Ari Smith 2011-12 · 2.17 PPG — Elmira UCHC
Casey Brown 2010-11 · 2.18 PPG — Hamilton NESCAC
Jillian Bilsborough 2023-24 · 1.82 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA
Bre Simon 2013-14 · 0.88 PPG 1.000 Hamline MIAC
Alyson Niebur 2017-18 · 1.44 PPG 0.600 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.