← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abigail Broz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-05-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 22 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 White Bear Lake High (women) USHS-MN-W 19 2 3 5 0.263 0.0397 0.0397
2021-22 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 27 11 15 26 0.963 0.1454 0.1454
2022-23 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 21 13 11 24 1.143 0.1726 0.1726
2023-24 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 25 17 11 28 1.120 0.1691 0.1650
2024-25 Cretin-Derham Hall (women) USHS-MN-W 26 14 15 29 1.115 0.1684 0.1579
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 34 8 17 25 0.735
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.74
2025-26 · Franklin Pierce
+434.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4520
Forward overall
#190
Forward born in 2007
#800
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Maine
0.16 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.