← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mira Jungåker Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2005-07-22 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 HV71 SDHL 4 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 HV71 SDHL 35 0 7 7 0.200 0.2310 0.2310
2021-22 HV71 SDHL 35 6 15 21 0.600 0.6930 0.6930
2022-23 HV71 SDHL 24 3 6 9 0.375 0.4331 0.4331
2023-24 HV71 SDHL 34 10 11 21 0.618 0.7133 0.7133
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W 29 6 19 25 0.862
2024-25 Ohio State D1 WCHA-W 19 5 11 16 0.842
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.62
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.84
2024-25 · Ohio State
+36.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 29 comparables)

21%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
79%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#38
Defenseman overall
#5
Defenseman born in 2005
#118
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Cornell (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.82 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cornell ·
0.212 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.758 Elite D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.