IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lulu Rucinski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2007-02-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Orono High USHS-MN-W 15 3 12 15 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 23 11 12 23 1.000 0.1606 0.1606 — —
2023-24 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 27 8 13 21 0.778 0.1249 0.1200 — —
2024-25 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 25 15 24 39 1.560 0.2505 0.2310 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HEA-W FR 36 4 11 15 0.417
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2025-26 · Maine
+136.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
70%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1024
Defenseman overall
#166
Defenseman born in 2007
#704
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Linnea Hedin
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Bella Sutton
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.69 PPG
→ Penn State (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kelsey Cline
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Linnea Hedin
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.114 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Bella Sutton
Penn State ·
0.324 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.