IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Olivia Grabianowski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 10 6 16 0.640 0.1028 0.1028 — —
2019-20 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 25 12 18 30 1.200 0.1927 0.1927 — —
2020-21 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 17 6 12 18 1.059 0.1700 0.1700 — —
2021-22 Shakopee High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 16 18 34 1.259 0.2022 0.2022 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Merrimack D1 HEA-W — 35 4 9 13 0.371
2024-25 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W — 33 3 7 10 0.303
2023-24 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W — 32 8 11 19 0.594
2022-23 Lindenwood D1 WCHA-W — 25 1 0 1 0.040
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2022-23 · Lindenwood
-71.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
90%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4201
Forward overall
#169
Forward born in 2003
#706
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Madison Woo
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Madison Woo
Brown ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.