IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Goldsworthy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2006-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 2 8 10 0.435 0.0698 0.0698 — —
2021-22 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 4 6 10 0.435 0.0698 0.0698 — —
2022-23 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 2 11 13 0.433 0.0696 0.0696 — —
2023-24 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 14 29 43 1.536 0.2466 0.2280 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 38 7 5 12 0.316
2025-26 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W SO 38 7 5 12 0.316
2024-25 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 37 1 4 5 0.135
2024-25 Minnesota State D1 CHA-W FR 37 1 4 5 0.135
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2024-25 · Minnesota
-13.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1573
Defenseman overall
#232
Defenseman born in 2006
#1161
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Dani Sadek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.46 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Hannah Sorkin
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton
0.25 No data
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dani Sadek
Ohio State ·
0.611 Strong D
actual D2/3 PPG
Hannah Sorkin
Princeton ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Grace Bizal
Boston College ·
0.268 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.