← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tristan Currie Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-01-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Bluewater Hawks OWHL-U22 29 2 2 4 0.138 0.0483 0.0483
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Post D1 CHA-W SR 37 6 4 10 0.270
2025-26 Post D3 SR 37 5 4 9 0.243
2024-25 Post D1 CHA-W JR 35 2 4 6 0.171
2024-25 Post D3 JR 31 2 3 5 0.161
2023-24 Post D1 CHA-W SO 36 8 6 14 0.389
2023-24 Post D3 SO 30 6 3 9 0.300
2022-23 Post D1 CHA-W FR 34 1 0 1 0.029
2022-23 Post D3 FR 15 1 0 1 0.067
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2022-23 · Post
-28.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#12209
Forward overall
#519
Forward born in 2003
#860
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Yale (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.90 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin ·
0.525 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Yale ·
0.290 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.