IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashley Wright Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Taft NE-Prep-Girls 22 0 1 1 0.050 0.0310 0.0310 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA JR 37 2 7 9 0.243
2025-26 Franklin Pierce D3 — JR 37 2 7 9 0.243
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA SO 31 2 4 6 0.194
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D3 — SO 27 1 2 3 0.111
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D1 NEWHA FR 35 0 4 4 0.114
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D3 — FR 28 0 4 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2023-24 · Franklin Pierce
+290.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7357
Defenseman overall
#681
Defenseman born in 2004
#1270
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Heather Olson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Xylia Lang
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Rachel Herzog
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Carlson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brinna Dochniak
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ RIT (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Heather Olson
Bemidji State ·
0.143 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Xylia Lang
Lindenwood ·
0.091 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG
Rachel Herzog
St. Cloud State ·
0.056 Developing D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.