← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sydney Bryant Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-10-14 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
St. Thomas
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.22
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2313
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.51
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5448
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
2%
NCAA D3W
80%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 19U-AAA-W 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.2052 0.2052
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State WCHA-W SO 37 2 7 9 0.243
2024-25 St. Cloud State WCHA-W FR 18 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Grace Bizal USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.35 PPG 0.268 Boston College
Dani Sadek USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.38 PPG 0.611 Ohio State
Kendra Nealey USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG 0.212 Cornell
Lauren Kelly NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG 0.208 Dartmouth
Erin O'Connor USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG 0.758 Cornell

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jenna Allen 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG 0.586 Augsburg MIAC
Ellie Newpower 2023-24 · 0.79 PPG 0.679 Hamline MIAC
Taylor Lesnar 2024-25 · 1.50 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA
Mikah Baptiste 2017-18 · 0.81 PPG 0.667 Norwich NEHC
Hallie Sheridan 2017-18 · 1.08 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.