IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maya D'Arcy Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-04-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Cambridge Rivulettes OWHL-U22 31 4 10 14 0.452 0.1582 0.1582 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SR 37 1 8 9 0.243
2024-25 Syracuse D1 CHA-W JR 38 3 5 8 0.210
2023-24 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SO 34 1 6 7 0.206
2022-23 Syracuse D1 CHA-W FR 36 1 6 7 0.194
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2022-23 · Syracuse
+30.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1446
Defenseman overall
#239
Defenseman born in 2004
#308
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Mekenzie Steffen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Kate Hallett
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Harvard (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Katie Robinson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Kenzie Prater
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.83 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.43 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Grace Bizal
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.16 PPG
→ Boston College (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Erica Schramel
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2015-16
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Shauna Bollinger
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2011-12
0.321 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gracyn Knowles
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.548 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.